Coherencia · OSF-COH-005
El triángulo que falta: Maxwell, Shannon y Boltzmann en la coherencia adaptativa
Por Carlos J. Pérez Pulido · ISHEA Institute ·
Propone EICI = E × I / F como el criterio formal que enlaza la energía estructurada de Maxwell, la fidelidad de señal de Shannon y el coste entrópico de Boltzmann: un índice relacional, no una ecuación física.
Preprint — Manuscrito depositado en OSF. Sin revisión por pares.
Pieza original en inglés.
Theoretical framework and exploratory cross-scale operationalization proposing the EICI (Energetic–Informational Coherence Index) as a candidate formal criterion connecting three foundational scientific frameworks: Maxwell's field equations (E — structured energy), Shannon's information theory (I — signal fidelity), and Boltzmann's statistical thermodynamics (F — entropic cost of order). Prigogine's dissipative structures and Mandelbrot's fractal geometry are identified as frameworks that approached but did not fully specify this criterion. EICI = Eₙ × Iₙ / Fₙ is a normalized relational index — not a dimensionally homogeneous physical equation — defining three system states: Δ+1 (coherence), Δ=0 (reorganization threshold), Δ−1 (collapse). Preliminary cross-scale operationalization across five domains (cellular, cognitive, organizational, national, civilizational). Formal mathematical supplementary (S1) included: normalization procedure, bifurcation analysis, Shannon channel capacity connection, Boltzmann entropy connection, Prigogine derivation agenda, Sobol sensitivity formalization. Conceptual triangle figure included. Part of K-Model cluster: 10.17605/OSF.IO/WST24.
This working paper proposes the EICI framework as the formal criterion that connects Maxwell (E), Shannon (I), and Boltzmann (F) as joint predictors of adaptive coherence — a connection that Prigogine's dissipative structures and Mandelbrot's fractal geometry each approached but did not explicitly formalize. EICI = Eₙ × Iₙ / Fₙ is presented as a candidate hypothesis, not a proven physical law. The paper explicitly separates three epistemological levels: formal (structural hypothesis), empirical (exploratory cross-scale operationalization), and philosophical (interpretive framing). Planetary biosignature application reserved for future dedicated paper. Supplementary S1 provides formal mathematical development including bifurcation ODE, critical slowing down (τ → ∞), Shannon SNR mapping, Boltzmann entropy export condition, and Sobol sensitivity definitions. Author: C.J. Pérez Pulido, ISHEA Institute, Bologna. Deposited May 2026 as child component of K-Model parent project WST24 (August 2025).
En la misma sala — Coherencia
NOTA-COH-001 · Coherencia
Narrativa no es confianza: sin confianza, la narrativa pierde fuerza
Una advertencia al mundo corporativo y político: el storytelling no compensa una arquitectura débil. Sin la confianza estructural que la sostenga, cualquier narrativa pierde fuerza.
NOTA-COH-002 · Coherencia
Managing desde el warehouse: management biofísico sin laboratorio (3/4)
Sin instrumentos ni laboratorio, solo observación directa: semanas aplicando management biofísico en una nave logística y unos resultados difíciles de ignorar.
NOTA-COH-003 · Coherencia
La respuesta no es cultural, es biológica (1/4)
El cuerpo sigue el ritmo antes de que la mente decida. Punto de partida de la serie: la respuesta al entorno no se explica por cultura, sino por biología.