Bioenergética · NOTA-BIO-001
El Nobel, la optogenética y una pregunta que quiero poner a prueba
Por Carlos J. Pérez Pulido · ISHEA Institute ·
Carlos J. Pérez Pulido comenta el Nobel de Fisiología o Medicina 2026, concedido a Deisseroth, Hegemann y Nagel por la optogenética, y plantea una pregunta que quiere poner a prueba.
Nota de divulgación — Escrito breve publicado en abierto. Pensamiento en curso, no resultado.
Pieza original en inglés.
🧠⚡ THE NOBEL, OPTOGENETICS — AND A QUESTION I WANT TO TEST
Today, Stanford announced that Karl Deisseroth, Peter Hegemann and Georg Nagel have been awarded the 2026 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for discoveries leading to optogenetics.
What caught my attention is not only the technology.
It is the underlying principle.
A signal can become action when it is coupled to an energetic biological system.
Optogenetics made this experimentally visible in neuroscience: light-sensitive proteins can translate light into changes in neuronal activity, allowing researchers to perturb specific cells and circuits and observe the consequences.
This brings me back to a question I have been pursuing through the ISHEA framework:
What happens when information becomes intention?
My working definition is simple:
INTENTION = INFORMATION MADE ACTION.
Not information merely stored.
Not information merely observed.
Information that actually changes the state of a system through directed action.
This leads to a deeper question:
Can the coupling between energy and guidance be measured?
In simplified form:
ENERGY × GUIDANCE → DIRECTED ACTION → STATE CHANGE
The critical concept is coupling.
Energy alone does not explain directed action.
Information alone does not necessarily produce action.
Something connects the two.
My hypothesis is that this coupling may be investigated through measurable relationships between:
E — Energy
I — Information / Guidance
F — Friction or resistance
ΔS — Change of system state
This is not a claim that the Nobel proves ISHEA.
It does not.
Rather, it reinforces why I believe the question deserves experimental investigation.
The objective should not be to confirm the equation.
It should be to try to falsify it.
If information can be converted into directed action under measurable energetic conditions, perhaps we can begin to quantify something usually treated as abstract:
the energetic cost of turning information into action.
That is the question I want to pursue.
Not because the idea is elegant.
But because nature gets the final vote.
— C.J. Pérez Pulido
President & Research Director
ISHEA Institute
Fte: https://lnkd.in/gt-ETdqA
https://lnkd.in/p/gbjiJ5Q2
#EnergyInformationCoupling #Bioenergetics
#InformationToAction #Optogenetics
#SystemsBiology #Biophysics
#Neuroscience #CausalPerturbation
#ScientificHypothesis #ISHEA #Economy5_0
#ComplexSystems
En la misma sala — Bioenergética
NOTA-BIO-002 · Bioenergética
Post 3 — Confrontation in Groundplay: cuando la geopolítica entra en el puerto
Tercera entrega de la serie Groundplay: tras las reglas y el tablero, el texto se pregunta dónde se libra realmente la confrontación geopolítica y la sitúa en el puerto, su terreno concreto.
NOTA-BIO-003 · Bioenergética
El «patio trasero» y el nuevo orden global: ¿qué significa para el business plan en Latam?
Un análisis de cómo la llamada Doctrina Donroe ha convertido en política explícita la metáfora del «patio trasero» y de lo que ese giro supone para cualquier plan de negocio en América Latina.
NOTA-BIO-004 · Bioenergética
¿Por qué los trabajadores más eficientes se vuelven más lentos a mitad de la jornada?
Para directores de operaciones y gerentes de logística: una lectura bioenergética de por qué los mejores trabajadores pierden productividad a mitad de jornada, un patrón que muchos ven y pocos explican.